Legal Opinion

Dallas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1998No. 899-97PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · MeCORMICKMeCORMICK, P.J.

in which BAIRD, OVERSTREET, KELLER, and HOLLAND, JJ., joined.

Appellant appealed his conviction for the misdemeanor offense of cruelty to animals. As one of the conditions of bail pending appellant’s appeal, the trial court prohibited appellant from engaging in the business of training and kenneling dogs. We have exercised our discretionary authority to review the Court of Appeals’ decision that the trial court lacked authority to place any conditions like this on bail in misdemeanor appeals “unless specifically provided for by statute.” Dallas v. State, 945 S.W.2d 328, 329-30…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Ex Parte DavilaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. County of Harris v. CrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Brookshire v. Houston Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State v. HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Ex Parte AndererCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Stolhandske v. Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Ex Parte CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API