Legal Opinion
In Re Mayer
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided June 29, 1993No. 19-00372PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
LOUISE DeCARL ADLER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Alfred and Ruth Nadel, judicial lien-holders, filed an objection to the debtor’s claim of homestead exemption.' The Nadéis assert that the debtor is not entitled to the homestead exemption under state law.
This proceeding to determine the allowance of debtor’s homestead exemption is a core matter as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and this Court may issue a final judgment subject to review as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 158.
FACTS
On November 6, 1989, Alfred and Ruth Nadel (“Nadel” or “creditor”) obtained a judgment against Lawrence L.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Herman (In Re Herman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Galvan v. Galvan (In Re Galvan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nadel v. Mayer (In Re Mayer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,913, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1912, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2470 in Re Robert John Arrol, Debtor. Robert John Arrol, Debtor-Appellee v. William H. Broach, Trustee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re BetzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- In Re BrutonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1994
- In Re ArrolUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.