Legal Opinion · Dissent

Owyhee, Inc. v. Robbins Marco Polo

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1965No. 10162Published

1DissentCallister, Justice

In my opinion there was a sale of stock to Luman and repurchase of the same by the corporation. Luman paid $4000 which was deposited to the corporate account. He thereupon, according to Mr. Robbins, became an officer and director of the corporation. The fact that no certificate of stock was issued to Luman did not prevent him *188from being a stockholder.1 In fact, the evidence is to the effect that the corporation had never issued stock certificates. Both Robbins and Luman testified that the payment by the latter of $4000 was for the purchase of stock.

The lower court held that the repurchase of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pace v. Pace Bros. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Robey v. HardyUtah Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API