Legal Opinion

Richard L. Parsons v. Jamie F. Mertz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2013No. A12A2093Published

1Opinion of the Court

WHOLE COURT NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ March 26, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A2093. PARSONS v. MERTZ et al. DO-096 DOYLE , Presiding Judge. Richard L. Parsons filed suit in magistrate court against Jamie Mertz, Patrick Ryan, Virtual Properties Realty, Inc., and Virtual Properties Plus, Inc. (collectively, “Virtual Properties”) to recover earnest money that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Mathis v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Altama Delta Corp. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Graham v. Marks & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Winder v. WinderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API