Legal Opinion

Howland v. Caille

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1908No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by J. Ward Howland, administrator of the estate of Arthur D. Howland, deceased, against A. Arthur Caille and another for an amount due on a land contract. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

March 18, 1898, Harry C. Hall and wife executed a warranty deed to John Ward of three lots in the city of Detroit for an expressed consideration of $2,800. March 22, 1898, Ward and Hall executed a land contract of one of the three lots, conveying the same to Hall for an expressed consideration of $2,500. April 28, 1899, Hall assigned the land contract to William J. Gutow, who assumed its performance. September 15, 1899, at the request of George W. Meyers, a partner of Gutow, and who had constructed a house on the lot in question and had conducted negotiations for a sale of the lot to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. French v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API