Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Stanley
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 13, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
S. Samuel Di Falco, S.
During the course of the examination of one of the executors by the Attorney-General pursuant to the provisions of SCPA 2211, questions were asked with respect to certain inter vivos transfers made by the decedent. The executor who was the donee of some of these gifts refused to answer these questions on the ground that the questions covered transactions which occurred prior to the period accounted for, and sought to elicit information as to matters not set forth in the account.
The present motion made by the executors is for a protective order under CPLR 3103 which seeks…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- St. Joseph's Hospital v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- In Re the Accounting of Van VolkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re the Estate of Van ValkenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- In re the Estate of JamesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- In re the Estate of BarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of BarkeyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Estate of DuffinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- In re the Estate of DormanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998