Harlow v. La Brun
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term. Action by Frederick S. Harlow against Hiram La Brun to dissolve a partnership. There was a judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.
The plaintiff brings this action for a dissolution of what he alleges to be a valid, existing copartnership between him and the defendant, and for an accounting as partners. The complaint sets out written articles of copartnership. The answer does not deny the making of the written articles of copartnership, but impliedly admits the same, and sets up in a defense that he was induced to enter into such copartnership by the fraudulent representations of the plaintiff that a stock of merchandise which he put into such copartnership cost the sum of $1,890.05, an undivided half of which would…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Fairchild v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Fleischmann v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Schumaker v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Jones v. WeirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Doughty v. PallissardNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Carr v. National Bank & Loan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.