Legal Opinion · Dissent

Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Szuma

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1987No. 2-86-066-CVPublished

1DissentKeltner, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

There are two issues before the court. First, whether the trial court erred in fail*956ing to realign the parties in a suit in which the insurance carrier appealed the Industrial Accident Board’s award. Second, whether the trial court erred in failing to grant the insurance carrier’s motion for mistrial, once it was apparent the jury was confused as to who was suing whom and why.

Anthony Szuma (Szuma) filed a claim with the Industrial Accident Board (I.A.B.) against Royal Insurance Company of America (Royal) claiming compensation under the Texas Worker’s Compensation Act.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Booth v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API