Legal Opinion

State v. I. & M. Amusements, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1966No. 9578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHover, J.

This is an appeal as of right from a judgment against the defendant corporation in the court below wherein it was convicted of violating Section 2905.34 of the Revised Code in that it did unlawfully and knowingly exhibit an obscene motion picture film. A jury was waived in the court below and the evidence submitted solely to the judge. In this event, under the law of Ohio, the judge himself acts as the presiding officer at the trial and as a jury in determining factual issues. (See 53 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 348 to 354, inclusive.) The appeal was heard in this court on defendant-appellant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. MazesOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. MazesOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. State v. CarneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. In Re Seven MagazinesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. City of Youngstown v. DeloretoOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. HoelscherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API