Legal Opinion

Cruz v. MM 879, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 25, 2020No. 1:15-cv-01563Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELA CRUZ; MARIA MADRIGAL; No. 1:15-cv-01563-TLN-EPG LOURDES BAIZ; and CHRISTIE 12 GOODMAN, individually, residing in California, 13 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 v. 15 MM 879, INC.; BARRETT BUSINESS 16 SERVICES, INC.; THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY, LLC; 17 MERRY MAIDS LP; and MM MAIDS 18 LLC. 19 Defendants. 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Angela Cruz, Maria Madrigal, Lourdes Baiz, 21 and Christie Goodman’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. SCHROEDER v. McDONALDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API