Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care System

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2005No. 03-0750PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

In this case, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, but then granted the plaintiffs motion for new trial, reconsidered the summary-judgment motion and the additional evidence and argument plaintiff offered in response, and again granted summary judgment in the defendant’s favor. We must decide whether the plaintiffs motion for new trial, which was granted before the second judgment was signed, operated to extend the appellate timetable. We hold that, because a motion for new trial that is granted cannot assail a later-signed judgment, it did not. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. HillandTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cummins v. Paisan Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. CookTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United Scaffolding, Inc. v. James LevineTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re Baylor Medical Center at GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. in Re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Viscount Properties II, L.P., D/B/A Hoy Fox toyota/lexusTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Figueroa v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API