Legal Opinion
Brown v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 1986No. 50016PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, John W. Brown, appeals the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. After the filing of his pro se motion, counsel was appointed to represent appellant. An amended motion was filed. The state filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the allegation of appellant’s motion were conclusively refuted by the record. The trial court, after oral argument of counsel, denied appellant’s request for an evidentiary hearing, sustained the state's motion to dismiss and filed detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Haliburton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Brown v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. AbernathyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Samuels v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- John Brown v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.