Legal Opinion

Troche v. Lieberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CPLR 3216 permits a court to dismiss an action for neglect to prosecute only after the court or the defendant has served the plaintiff with a written notice demanding that the plaintiff file a note of issue within 90 days after receipt of the demand, and advising that the failure to comply with the demand will serve as a basis for a motion to dismiss the action (see CPLR 3216 [b] [3]; Harrison v Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr., 43 AD3d 996 [2007]). “Since CPLR 3216 is a legislative creation and not part of a court’s inherent power, the failure to serve a written notice that conforms to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase v. ScavuzzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Airmont Homes, Inc. v. Town of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Anjum v. KaragozAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Felix v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Bowman v. KusnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michaels v. Sunrise Building & Remodeling, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API