Legal Opinion

Muhleman & Kayhoe, Inc. v. Marks

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The plaintiff in error by this proceeding is asking that a judgment for $525 be set aside. It was rendered in the court below upon the verdict of a jury, which was against the plaintiff in error and in favor of the defendants in error.

Three sisters, Misses Sallie, Estelle and Anna Marks, owned a lot on Seminary Avenue in the city of Richmond. They decided to have a dwelling, to be used as their home, erected on the lot and for that purpose they entered into a written contract with Muhleman and Kayhoe, Inc., builders and contractors. The contract was made on April 8, 1933, and it provided that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. MacLeodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Saint Mary's School & Junior College, Inc. v. WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Stern Realty Corp. v. Van DorenVirginia Circuit Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API