Legal Opinion

S.F. v. State ex rel. T.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1996No. 2950025PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

In August 1994, the State of Alabama, on behalf of T.M., sued S.F., alleging that S.F. was the father of T.M.’s minor child, and seeking child support. The complaint also sought to require S.F. to pay one-half of all the child’s medical expenses not paid by insurance, and it sought a judgment against S.F. for child support for the period back to the child’s birth on June 7, 1993. The parties submitted to court-ordered blood testing. The results of the tests indicated a 99.47% probability that S.F. was the father of the child. On February 14, 1995, the district court found S.F. to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. People v. LibertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. L. Pamela P. v. Frank S.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ex Parte University of South AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Dailey v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C.M. v. D.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. LeClair v. Reed ex rel. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API