Doe v. The University of Mississippi
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREW DOE PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-138-DPJ-ASH STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendants have moved in limine [303] to exclude certain categories of evidence. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part as set out below. I. Background Plaintiff Andrew Doe sued the University of Mississippi and others after he was suspended his sophomore year for alleged sexual misconduct. The Court granted Plaintiff partial summary judgment on his due-process claim under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- John Doe v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Willie Bea Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Richmond State SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- John Doe v. Columbia College ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.