Marriage of Guill
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 The dissolution of Douglas and Candace’s marriage originally came before us in 2006. Multiple appeals and other related cases have followed. In this appeal, Doug challenges the Amended Judgment issued on October 29,2013, by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. In that judgment, the District Court revised downward the amount of money Doug owed Candace from an earlier judgment, and granted Candace the right to have the judgment entered as a foreign judgment in Idaho where Doug retains property. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 We do not repeat the underlying facts of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Turner v. Mountain Engineering & Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GuillMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GuillMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Traders State Bank of Poplar v. MannMontana Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriage of PaschenMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Sw. Mont. Bldg. Indus. Ass'n v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Boushie v. WindsorMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- R. Skurdal v. J. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2025