Legal Opinion

Volkmer v. Curlee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1953No. 12603PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMBLEN, Chief Justice.

This is an action by James Curlee against Frederick Volkmer to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. , Trial was before a jury which, in response to special issues submitted, found the defendant, Volkmer, guilty of several acts of negligence proximately causing the collision. The jury also found the plaintiff, Curlee, guilty of contributory negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout, which they found was a proximate cause of the collision. The trial court, after receiving such verdict, upon motion of the plaintiff, disregarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Liberty Film Lines, Inc. v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jones v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Edson v. Perry-Foley Funeral HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Porter v. Liberty Film Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Watts v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Bledsoe v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Trinity River Authority v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API