Hughes v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Mobile City Court. Heard before Hon. O. J. Semmes. Walter Hughes was convicted of burglary and he appeals. What purports to be a bill of exceptions contains no exceptions, and hence, cannot be considered.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
What purports to be a bill of exceptions found in the record contains no exceptions, and is consequently not a bill of exceptions, and presents no rulings of the lower court for review. — Blackwell v. State, 8 Ala. App. 430, 62 South. 1034.
The indictment contains three counts, one for burglary, one for grand larceny, and one for receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be stolen. There was a general verdict of guilty, and the court adjudged the defendant guilty of burglary, and sentenced him to the penitentiary for three years. In this there was no error. — Cawley v. State, 37 Ala. 152;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- McGuff v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Bell & Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- First National Bank v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wiggins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Lauren v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930