Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Winchester

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 16, 1874Published

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. -

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Hardin: Muir & Biju/r, for executor. Duke, Richards, for appellees. J. F. Bullitt, for appellant.

The decision of this case must be ruled by those of Hughey et al. v. Sidwell’s Heirs, 18 B. Monroe 259, and Walters et al. v. Ratliff, 5 Bush 575. If, notwithstanding the right of appeal to the court of common pleas from the judgment of probate, there existed grounds for impeaching that judgment in a court of equity, as any other decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the petition in this case, does not, in our opinion, state facts Which are sufficient to give a court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walters v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API