Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Roth

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 15, 1997No. 86208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

693 So.2d 969 (1997)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner,

v.

Robert ROTH, Respondent.

No. 86208.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 15, 1997.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Rhonda G. Lapin, Bar Counsel, Miami, for Complainant.

Nicholas R. Friedman, Vilas, North Carolina; and A.J. Barranco of the Law Offices of A.J. Barranco & Associates, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Robert Roth. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The Bar filed a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. The Florida Bar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Florida Bar v. ArangoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Florida Bar v. DubbeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API