Legal Opinion

Reitzie v. Town of Kirkland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1926No. 20013. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal results from an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint, after which appellants refused to plead further, and the action was dismissed.

The contest involves only the validity of certain local improvement assessments made against the property of appellants by respondent, the town of Kirkland.

The amended complaint alleges, in substance, that on or about April 20, 1925, the council of the town of Kirkland passed an ordinance known as No. 247, providing for the improvement of certain streets as follows:

“Kirkland Avenue from Lake Avenue to the city limits on the north side,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rucker Bros. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Seattle & Puget Sound Packing Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Giles v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lee v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wade v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API