Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cambre v. Gerald

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1971No. 4194Published

1DissentLemmon, Judge

My only point of departure from the majority opinion is where they hold that partial payment by the maker of a note interrupts prescription as to an indorser (accommodation or otherwise) not expressly bound in solido with the maker.1

Generally, a partial payment by one joint debtor interrupts prescription only as to the debtor making the payment. Jordan v. Smith, 206 La. 765, 20 So.2d 17 (1944). However, LSA-C.C. 3552 provides an exception, whereby payment by one debtor in solido interrupts prescription as to all the others Barnett v. Sandford, 18 La.App. 262, 137 So. 566 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1931).

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. McCalop v. NewcombSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  3. Hickman v. StaffordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  4. Barnett v. SandfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API