Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Phenix Insurance v. Mauldin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1968No. 43908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant contends that as a matter of law the plaintiff could not maintain the action against it. The appellant urges that a surety’s engagement rests on the same legal obligation as is by law imposed on the officer and that the surety may plead anything which the officer might plead in his denial of liability on the bond; that public officers, when acting within their duty and authority, are not liable for their acts unless such are wilful, malicious and reckless with wanton .disregard for the safety or rights of others. 43 AmJur 181, Public Officers, § 407; Vickers v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Vickers v. MotteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Kendrick v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Hawkins v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Seay v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Price v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Conklin v. ZantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API