Legal Opinion
Takacs v. Horvath
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Manifestly the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment declaring the dissolution of the partnership in which he and the defendant have engaged under the name and style of Broadway Cafe and Bowling Alley at No. 73 French Street in the City of New Brunswick. R.S. 42:1-31, 1-a, N.J.S.A.
The prevailing terms of the partnership are expressed in articles of agreement executed by the plaintiff and defendant on June 23, 1941. Cf. R.S. 42:1-23, N.J.S.A. For present purposes,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Voight v. Board of Excise CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Walsh v. BradleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Iavicoli v. DimarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Lachow v. AlperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- Rawlins v. TrevethanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kalogeras v. 239 Broad Avenue, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Darrah Food Services, Inc. v. Lambertville House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- In re Circle 10 Restaurant, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2014