Legal Opinion
Royal China, Inc., and Brookpark Royalon, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company, Royal China, Inc., and Brookpark Royalon, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1974No. 74-1024Published
1Opinion of the Court
497 F.2d 989
ROYAL CHINA, INC., and Brookpark Royalon, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
ROYAL CHINA, INC., and Brookpark Royalon, Inc.,
Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 74-1024, 74-1025.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued April 16, 1974.
Decided June 18, 1974.
John E. Martindale, Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.
Sheldon Berns, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellees; Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arnson, Michael H. Diamant, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief.
Before…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Columbus Stamping & Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
- American Security Service, Inc. v. BaumannOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- C. E. Riley Co. v. Levy Overall Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1919
- Saperston v. Rae-Columbus, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Royal China, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974