Chambers v. Chambers

'TATE, Justice

(dissenting).

' I respectfully dissent.

The issue of state law before the court is clear-cut.1 A husband was crippled during a marriage as a result of a 1966 accident. In 1967, he divorced his wife .hsl ¡an-adulteress, he receiving custody of -¿¡he', ¡children of the marriage. After the divorce, ' his claim for personal injuries was settled in 1967. Of this amount, almost all of $211,000 was obviously for loss of future earnings, future medical expenses,: and future pain and suffering — losses which., will be sustained by the husband after the community was terminated by the -1967…