Legal Opinion

Buschelberg v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1956No. 29383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Commissioner.

This is an action to recover damages caused by flood waters flowing through an underpass in the right of way of defendant’s railroad embankment. The trial was to the court and resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff from which the defendant has appealed.

The general area with which we are concerned is the low flood plain of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers near their confluence. This area is peninsular in shape and about seven miles in length, bounded by the waters of the Missouri on the south and by the waters of the Mississippi on the north, as the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Smithpeter v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Murphy v. St. Louis, San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corrington v. KalicakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. TerrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API