Legal Opinion

Lahay v. HASTINGS LODGE NO 1965 BPOE

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 56785, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the Court of Appeals which reversed a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board.1 The dispute relates solely to the computation of benefits allotted to the plaintiff, Richard Lahay.

At the time he was injured, plaintiff was employed by defendant, Hastings Lodge, as a part-time bartender. He was concurrently employed on a full-time basis as a claims adjuster by an insurance company.

While tending bar on February 12, 1971 Lahay *471stepped on an ice cube, slipped, and injured his back when he attempted to break his fall.

Prior to injury, plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bowles v. James Lumber CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Matter of Brandfon v. Beacon Theatre Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Buehler v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Black v. American & Foreign InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Trejo v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Leizerman v. First Flight Freight ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gasparick v. H C Price Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Irvan v. Borman’s, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API