Legal Opinion

American Nat. Bank v. National Bank of Claremore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1926No. 16753PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The defendant in error, Naücinal Bank of Olaremore, as plaintiff, instituted this action in the district ■ court of Rogers county against the Guaranty State Bank of Ardmore, predecessor g: the plaintiff in error, American Na tional Bank of Ardmore, AV. E. Hotnaday, and H. A. Ledbetter, as defendants, to recover the sum of $1,000, alleged to be duo the plaintiff, National Bank of Claremore. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The cause came on for trial on the 7th day of March, 1925, and at the conclusión thereof judgmenc was rendered in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Standard Trust Co. of New York v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Wisner v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Commercial State Bank of Fort Worth v. Harkrider-Keith-Cooke Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Hendrix v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Mt. Vernon National Bank v. Canby State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. First State Bank v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. General Finance Corporation of Florida v. Central Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API