Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Grebstein v. Lehman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 1, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

— In ex parte Edwards, 11 Fla. 174, it was said: “In the absence of any statutory limitation or restriction, the power of the several courts over the matter of ‘contempts’ is omnipotent, and its exercise in any particular ease is not to be questioned by any other tribunal. It is the great bulwark established by the common law for the protection of courts of justice, and for the maintenance of their dignity, authority and efficiency.”

While this language must be construed in the light of the doctrine, which has also been recognized by this court, that no department of the government is, under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ex parte EarmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Ex parte SeniorSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Ex parte BiggersSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Ex parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sneed v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Skipper v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Baumgartner v. JoughinSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. In Re EskayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API