Legal Opinion
Salgado v. Ring
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 1, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 7, 2004, which denied her motion, denominated as one for leave to reargue and renew, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the defendants’ prior motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The plaintiff’s motion, denominated as one for leave to reargue and renew, was based upon evidence which could have been discovered earlier with due diligence. Since the plaintiff failed to proffer a reasonable…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- EMC Mortgage Corp. v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Reyes v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terranova v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DiCienzo v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Siegel v. Monsey New Square Trails Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hatzioannides v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Donovan v. RizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.