Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weidrick v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-364Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s holding today for three reasons: (1) this issue was decided eight years ago and today’s overruling of Jackson v. Ozment, 283 Ark. 100, 671 S.W.2d 736 (1984) significantly detracts from the doctrine of stare decisis; (2) the Court today violates the separation of powers of the Arkansas Constitution when it holds that a court-imposed Rule of Civil Procedure preempts a statute enacted by the legislature after the court promulgated the Rules; and (3) the Court misconstrues the application of Ark. R. Civ. P. 81(a) to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987). I…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Gay v. RabonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API