Legal Opinion
Miri v. Clinton
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 1, 2014No. 11-15248PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*320 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CLINTON’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS [58]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is a motion to decertify the class in this class action. This motion was filed contemporaneously with Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of injunctive relief. The Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claim for injunc-tive relief. As a result, the Court may now, and for the reasons set forth below does, GRANT Defendants’ motion to decertify the class.
I. FACTS
The facts of this case have been reviewed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Teresa Barney and Randy Barney, Bonita Waldron, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Intervenor-Appellant v. Holzer Clinic, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Otha GRIGSBY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Binta B. Ex Rel. S.A. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Bradberry v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crain v. Upstart Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025