Legal Opinion

Hearn v. Hearn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1965No. 22745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

1. The defendant’s principal contention is that there was no evidence to show the wife had any valid cause to separate herself from her husband and thus the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding temporary alimony and child support.

“It has long been the rule that one act of cruelty, not of a violent or serious character, standing alone, is not a sufficient ground for a divorce,” (Phinizy v. Phinizy, 154 Ga. 199, 114 SE 185), or “to justify a wife in leaving her husband and living in a state of separation from him.” Brown v. Brown, 217 Ga. 671, 673 (124 SE2d 399).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phinizy v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Moss v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Swearingen v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  4. Dyche v. DycheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Childre v. ChildreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API