Legal Opinion

Bruen v. Huff

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1948No. Civ. No. 7169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

fl] The plaintiffs have objected to Interrogatories 3(a) and 3(b) propounded by defendants. The objection is based upon the demand that plaintiffs furnish copies of certain licenses mentioned in the interrogatories.

The objection must be sustained. The interrogatories are issued under authority of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A., which does not authorize the demand made. If the defendants are entitled to the copies demanded they must show “good cause therefor” and the court will thereupon order the plaintiffs “to produce and permit the inspection…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Alfred Pearson & Co. v. HayesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Pappas v. Loew's Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Walsh v. Pullman Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API