Legal Opinion

Hinchliffe v. Koning

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. 93-6335Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeel, J.

This is an action seeking an order of mandamus. The plaintiff, Deborah Skauen Hinchliffe, initially sought an order from this court directing the defendant, Robert J. Koning, the Building Commissioner for the town of Carlisle, to revoke a Special Permit granted to Dr. Peter L. Morey (“Morey”) by the Board of Appeals of the Town of Carlisle (the “Board”). The plaintiff now concedes that such an order is not permissible.1 Instead, she has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56 on her prayer for an order that the defendant comply with section 8.1 of the Town’s By-Laws.2 For the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vokes v. Avery W. Lovell, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Lutheran Service Ass'n of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Callahan v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. J & R Investment, Inc. v. City ClerkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API