Legal Opinion

Morris v. Mull

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1924No. 18143PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The paramount question involved in this case is: What degree of diligence is required of an executor in notifying a legatee under a will of a bequest in time to claim the same before it shall become the private property of the executor?

It is admittedly the law that the relation between an executor and the legatees and devisees in a will is that of trustee and cestui que trust, and that a fiduciary relation and obligation exist as to notice and good faith and fidelity in discharging the terms of the trust.

It is the claim of the defendant in error that he has complied with the statutory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dundas v. ChrismanNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Judd v. City Trust & Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re Trusteeship of Trust Created by Will of SedgwickOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Dombey v. RindsfoosOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. O'Neill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API