Legal Opinion

Strong v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 22, 1999No. C-98-3656 CWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

WILKEN, District Judge.

The Court has received Magistrate Judge Laporte’s Report and Recommendation filed May 13, 1999. No objections to the report were filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is Granted. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LAPORTE, United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Administrative Subpoena Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Cable Car Advertisers, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Estate of Kevin Brown v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API