Brundage v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
The defendant was convicted of theft by taking of two pieces of machinery. Held:
1. The trial court refused to admit into evidence on its own motion, a "bill of sale” for a "bob cat.” The document was clearly irrelevant as it pertained to a different "bob cat” than the one alleged to have been stolen. A court may exclude evidence on its own motion that is not relevant, material or competent. Moody v. Davis, 10 Ga. 403.
2. The state by its evidence established a prima facie case and it included testimony that one of the items of machinery alleged to have been stolen was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Moody v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Flantroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Whiddon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Saladine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984