Legal Opinion

Brundage v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1977No. 54038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of theft by taking of two pieces of machinery. Held:

1. The trial court refused to admit into evidence on its own motion, a "bill of sale” for a "bob cat.” The document was clearly irrelevant as it pertained to a different "bob cat” than the one alleged to have been stolen. A court may exclude evidence on its own motion that is not relevant, material or competent. Moody v. Davis, 10 Ga. 403.

2. The state by its evidence established a prima facie case and it included testimony that one of the items of machinery alleged to have been stolen was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Moody v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Flantroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Whiddon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Saladine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API