Legal Opinion
Lesikar v. EOG Resources, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided September 28, 2007No. 07-06-0285-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Before us is an appeal involving a written Rule 11 settlement agreement. After the parties executed the document, the trial court attempted to enforce what it believed to be its terms, but in doing so exceeded the scope of the accord, said Harriet Lesikar. EOG Resources, Inc. disagreed. We reverse and remand the cause.
Background
The suit involved a mineral interest Le-sikar inherited and her attempt to have EOG acknowledge its extent. Also sought were damages reflecting the deficiencies in money due her for gas taken under one or more leases encumbering the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Slusser v. Union Bankers Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
- Randle v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Sitaram v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of North Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Branson R-IV School District v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garza v. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- in Re Hulcher Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Anastacio G. Garza and Barbara T. Garza v. Alejandro E. Villarreal, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Anastacio G. Garza and Barbara T. Garza v. Alejandro E. Villarreal, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.