Legal Opinion

Daniells v. Daniells

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This case was heard at the last October term, and reversed. IJpon application made for a rehearing, the opinion was withheld. After reargument, we are satisfied that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Plaintiff brought assumpsit on the common counts, filing the following claim as a bill of particulars:

“ The sum of one hundred and forty-one dollars and sixty-eight cents ($141.68) cash, defendant received on judgment rendered by S. Chadwick, justice of the peace, in Grand Ledge, Mich., in favor of this defendant, as surviving partner to David I. Daniells, deceased, rendered on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eyck v. WingMichigan Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dodson v. McKelveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API