Jane v. Queen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
WALLER, Justice:
This is an adoption case. Respondents, the Does, sought to adopt Baby Boy Tanner contending the biological father’s, Travis Queen’s, consent to adoption was not required; alternatively, they sought termination of Queen’s parental rights. The family court held Queen’s consent to adoption was necessary and denied termination. A two-judge majority of the Court of Appeals reversed, finding Queen’s consent to adoption unnecessary; Judge Howard dissented. We find the evidence in this case supports the ruling of the family court. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Abernathy v. Baby BoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Roe v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.