Legal Opinion

Jane v. Queen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 17, 2001No. 25363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

WALLER, Justice:

This is an adoption case. Respondents, the Does, sought to adopt Baby Boy Tanner contending the biological father’s, Travis Queen’s, consent to adoption was not required; alternatively, they sought termination of Queen’s parental rights. The family court held Queen’s consent to adoption was necessary and denied termination. A two-judge majority of the Court of Appeals reversed, finding Queen’s consent to adoption unnecessary; Judge Howard dissented. We find the evidence in this case supports the ruling of the family court. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Abernathy v. Baby BoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Roe v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API