Legal Opinion

Oaktown Telephone Co. v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1935No. 14,788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellee brought an action against the appellant by an amended complaint in one paragraph, to recover in quantum meruit, for services rendered and accepted by appellant at its special instance and request. To this complaint appellant filed an answer in three paragraphs. The first was a general denial. The second alleged that the services for which appellee sought recovery were rendered to another company and not to the appellant, and that appellee had been fully paid for the services so rendered by such other company. The third pleaded payment. Appellee filed a reply in general denial to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ramseyer v. DennisIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Ft. Wayne Cooperage Co. v. PageIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bruceville Telephone Company v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Freelandville Telephone Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Kaiu v. TasakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API