239, 243 & 247 Corp. v. Dorothy Poole
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMaurice Wahl, J.
The landlord instituted this proceeding against the tenant to evict by reason of tenant’s holding over in the premises. It appears that the following salient facts are not in dispute: namely, that a one-year lease between the parties of the decontrolled apartment expired April 30, 1968, and same was not renewed or extended, and that although a 30-day notice to increase the rent was served by landlord upon tenant to be effective February 1,1970, the landlord waived the increase and *954agreed to accept and did receive the rental provided for in the expired lease. It appears also, without dispute,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fifty Central Park West Corp. v. BastienCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- 239, 243 & 247 Corp. v. GabelNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Fifty Central Park West Corp. v. BastienAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
- 239, 243 & 247 Corp. v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1966