Legal Opinion

People v. Hackett

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira R Globerman, J.

The defendants’ motions to inspect the Grand Jury minutes in this case present a rare situation requiring a determination of whether opinion evidence by a lay witness before the Grand Jury is competent, admissible and capable of legally sustaining an indictment. The motions also raise the question of when the legal advisor to the Grand Jury, the District Attorney, is required to instruct the grand jurors about the proper evaluation of circumstantial evidence so that the integrity of the proceeding is not impaired.

I

The defendants have been indicted for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. La BelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API