Commonwealth v. Conaghan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1DissentSosman, J.
(dissenting, with whom Greaney and Ireland, JJ., join.) The majority opinion holds that a competency examination under G. L. c. 123, § 15 (a), must be performed in order to decide whether the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty plea she entered back in 1992. In my opinion, the ordering of a § 15 (a) examination at this juncture is inappropriate as a matter of law and is, in any event, totally unnecessary to the resolution of the motion to withdraw a guilty plea. The majority opinion has twisted § 15 (a) to solve what it perceives as a possible miscarriage of justice when,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Fogarty v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DeVincentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- People v. TorresNew York Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.