Legal Opinion

Fry v. Soper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Newaygo. Trover. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This was an action of trover brought by Soper as assignee of Carter & Minkler, to recover the value of a stock of goods taken from him by the defendant.

On the trial Fry claimed to have taken the goods as deputy sheriff by virtue of a writ of attachment issued out of the circuit court at the suit of John P. Woods against Carter and Minkler as defendants, and farther claimed that the assignment to Soper was fraudulent *728and void as against the creditors of the assignees, for matters apparent upon the face thereof, and also because of other matters as shown by the testimony on the trial.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosenbury v. AngellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Dawley v. SherwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hine v. Commercial BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Grenier v. HildMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McLaughlin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API