Sickles v. Dallas Center Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Court. —How. J. H. IIendeeson, Judge. This is an action in equity for an accounting for certain promissory notes, and for judgment for the amount thereof. There was a trial on the merits, and a j udgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBotiieook, C. J.
i equity ■ pteTdin'j”3: evidcuue. I. In March, 1883, one F. Hubbard was indebted to the Dallas Center Bank in the sum about one thousand and thirty-six dollars, and the bank held, as collateral security for said debt, certain promissory *409notes on third persons, payable to Hubbard, and pledged by him to the bank as security. At the same time the plaintiff herein, as agent of the Moline Wagon Company, held a claim against said Hubbard, arid obtained from him an assignment of the notes held by the bank. This assignment was taken as collateral security for the debt due from Hubbard to the Moline…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Callanan v. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Latham v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Cutter v. FanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Baker v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Sadler v. BeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McComb v. Council Bluffs InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Allemang v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Independent School District of Oakland v. HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Leonard v. SehmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.