Legal Opinion

Hartford v. Hollander

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 25, 1908No. 239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Per curiam

This is a suit for the alleged infringement of reissue letters patent Nos. 12,437 and 12,399, issued January 16, 1906, and November 7, 1905, respectively, to J. M. M. Truffault, assignee of the complainants. The first patent is for frictional retarding means for spring vehicles; the second, for anti-vibration devices for vehicles. Infringement of complainant’s trade-mark “Shock Absorber” and unfair competition are also charged. The Circuit Court found that the first-mentioned reissue patent was invalid, and that the charges of unfair competition and trade-mark infringement were without merit,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford v. MooreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
  2. Hartford v. Westen Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Westen Mfg. Co. v. HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API